Policy paper: South China Sea policy in the perspective of the United States and the perspective of China

Authors

  • Fredy Efendy Universitas Pasundan Bandung, Indonesia
  • Imam Budiman Universitas Pasundan Bandung, Indonesia
  • Fauziah Muniroh Amini Universitas Pasundan Bandung, Indonesia
  • Alifia Ramandha Universitas Pasundan Bandung, Indonesia
  • Luthfiany Anindy Universitas Pasundan Bandung, Indonesia
  • Yasmin Gasani Fadhlih Universitas Pasundan Bandung, Indonesia

Keywords:

South China Sea, Policy, United States, China

Abstract

This policy paper aims to propose policy options that the United States might choose regarding the situation in the South China Sea as well as options from China's own policies in addressing regional conflicts. The report will discuss policy recommendations, feasible policy options, state interests in the South China Sea and important background information of the area of concern. This research uses qualitative methods in this research using books, articles and journals as reference sources of research cited in accordance with the theme of this research which discusses the South China Sea dispute. While the approach used is a qualitative descriptive approachThe paper argues that the current US policy is holistic, thoughtful and reasonable. Any changes should be small and should follow the original principles defined in 1995 who has related to the conflict over claims in the South China Sea.

References

Acharya, & Ramsay. (n.d.). The Calculus of the Security Dilemma.

Andrias Darmayadi, & Ervina Nabilah Purnamasari. (2022). Indonesia – China Relations In The Natuna Sea Dispute Resolution: Struggle For Sovereignty. JOURNAL OF EASTERN EUROPEAN AND CENTRAL ASIAN RESEARCH, 1–8.

Andika. (2017). Analisis Politik Luar Negeri IndonesiaChina di Era Presiden Joko Widodo: Benturan Kepentingan Ekonomi dan Kedaulatan? Indonesia Perspective, 2(2), 161–179.

Avidit Acharya, & Kristopher W. Ramsay. (2013). The Calculus of the Security Dilemma,” Quarterly Journal of Political Scienc. 8(2), 183–203.

Azhar Fuad Nugraha. (2023, May 9). Laut Cina Selatan Dilema Keamanan Filipina di Kawasan Asia-Pasifik.

Khoirur Rizal Lutfi. (2014). Teori Hukum Alam Dan Kepatuhan Negara Terhadap Hukum Internasional. Jurnal Yuridis , 2(2), 92–206.

Robert Jervis. (1978). Cooperation Under the Security Dilemma,” . World Politics .

Wendy N. Duong. (2007). Following The Path of Oil: The Law of the Sea or Real Politik ± What Good does Law do in the South China Sea Territorial Conflicts? Fordham International Law Journal, 1098.

Arief B. Darmawan dan G. Lintang Ndadari. (2017). Keterlibatan Amerika Serikat dalam Sengketa Laut Tiongkok Selatan pada Masa Pemerintahan Presiden Brack Obama. Jurnal Hubungan Internasional, 6, 1–2.

Arief Bakhtiar Darmawan. (2018). Dinamika Isu Laut Tiongkok Selatan: Analisis Sumber-Sumber Kebijakan Luar Negeri Tiongkok dalam Sengketa. Jurnal Ilmiah Hubungan Internasional, 14(1), 13.

Johnson D. (1997). Drawn into the fray: Indonesia’s Natuna Islands meet China’s long gaze South. Asian Affairs: An American Review. 24(3), 153–161.

Endah Rantau Itasari, & Dewa Gede Sudika Mangku. (2020). Elaborasi Urgensi Dan Konsekuensi Atas Kebijakan Asean Dalam Memelihara Stabilitas Kawasan Di Laut Cina Selatan Secara Kolektif. Harmony, 143–154.

Koran Jakarta. (n.d.). Locsin: Asean Tak Miliki Kekuatan Untuk Jaga Perdamaian Dan Keamanan (Filipina Dukung Aukus). Https://File.Lelangdjkn.Kemenkeu.Go.Id/ View-File/2021/09/22/614acac6512ef-64432Srupengumuman-29543ava.Pdf.

Hari Utomo; Mitro Prihantoro dan Lena Adriana. (2017). Peran Pemerintah Indonesia dalam Mengelola Konflik Laut China Selatan. Jurnal Prodi Damai Dan Resolusi Konflik, 3(3), 63–88.

Humphrey Wangke. (2020). Menegakkan Hak Berdaulat Indonesia di Laut Natuna Utara. Info Singkat, 8(1), 7–12.

Kebijakan dalam Perspektif Amerika Serikat dan Perspektif China. (n.d.). Universitas Pasundan.

Kusumasomantri, A. R. (2015). Strategi Hedging Indonesia terhadap Klaim Teritorial Tiongkok di Laut Tiongkok Selatan. GLOBAL, 17(1), 26.

M. Fravel. (2011). China’s Strategy in the South China Sea. Jurnal Contemporary Southeast Asia, 3(3), 299–310.

Mathieu Duchatel. (2020). China Trends #6 - Generally Stable? Facing US Pushback in the South China Sea. Retrieved from Institut Montaigne website: https://www.institutmontaigne.org/en/blog/ china-trends-6-generally-stable-facing-us-pushbacksouth-china-sea

Melita Angelin Bidara. (2018). Kepentingan Amerika Serikat Dalam Konflik Laut Cina Selatan. Jurnal Jurusan Ilmu Pemerintahan, 1(1), 1.

Thomas, V. F. (2020). Kekayaan Laut Natuna Alasan Cina Selalu Mengklaimnya.

Yuli Ari Sulistyani; et.al. (2021). Indonesia’s Responses toward the South China Sea Dispute During Joko Widodo’s Admininstration. Jurnal Politica, 12(1), 84–101.

Yulima Rimapradesi; et.al. (2023). Sikap Indonesia Terhadap Krisis China dan Amerika Serikat di Laut China Selatan. Journal of Law and Contemporary Issue, 2(1), 42–46.

Yuli Ari Sulistyan, Andhini Citra Pertiwi, & Marina Ika Sari. (2021). Respons Indonesia Terhadap Sengketa Laut China Selatan Semasa Pemerintahan Joko Widodo. Politica, 12(1), 85–103.

Yuli Ari Sulistyan, Andhini Citra Pertiwi, & Marina Ika Sari. (2021). Respons Indonesia Terhadap Sengketa Laut China Selatan Semasa Pemerintahan Joko Widodo. Politica, 12(1), 85–103.

Downloads

Published

2023-06-27

How to Cite

Efendy, F., Budiman, I., Amini, F. M., Ramandha, A. ., Luthfiany Anindy, & Fadhlih, Y. G. (2023). Policy paper: South China Sea policy in the perspective of the United States and the perspective of China. The International Journal of Politics and Sociology Research, 11(1), 06–15. Retrieved from https://ijobsor.pelnus.ac.id/index.php/ijopsor/article/view/101

Issue

Section

Social, Culture, Politics