Implementation of borrow-used evidence criminal case in Makassar City

Suhadi Suhadi; Syamsuddin  Muchtar; Audyna Mayasari Muin

doi:10.35335/ijopsor.v11i1.109

Authors

Suhadi Suhadi Universitas Hasanuddin, Indonesia
Syamsuddin Muchtar Universitas Hasanuddin, Indonesia
Audyna Mayasari Muin Universitas Hasanuddin, Indonesia

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.35335/ijopsor.v11i1.109

Keywords:

Criminal Law, Criminal Act, Evidence , Law Enforcement, Lease

Abstract

This research examined the legal framework for borrowing and exploiting evidence in criminal trials in Makassar City and the legal protections for evidence owners. Research is empirical normative legal. The investigation found that (1) the lending and use of evidence is governed by unique norms at each level of examination, not by law. (2) The form of legal protection for the owner of evidence in borrowing and using evidence is preventive legal protection, law enforcement does not immediately give permission because it is feared that it will disappear or change form, granting permission by looking at whether the loan is appropriate or not based on the level of urgency, and fulfilling the formal requirements which refers to Article 44 paragraph (2) of Law 8/1981 concerning the Criminal Procedure Code jo. Article 30 PP 27/1983 concerning the Implementation of the Criminal Procedure Code, as well as material requirements referring to the rules for each level of examination, and repressive legal protection, Article 46 of the Criminal Procedure Code, to minimize disputes in Article 221 paragraph (1) number (2) and Article 233 Law 1/1946 concerning Criminal Law Regulations, Article 10 paragraph (2) letter (h) Perpol 7/2022 concerning the Professional Code of Ethics and the Police Code of Ethics Commission, Article 7 paragraph (1) letter (f) and (h) Perja-RI No.PER- 014/A/JA/11/2012 Concerning the Prosecutor's Code of Conduct and to avoid disputes most of the evidence is returned after an inkracht decision from the Court. The implication of this research is to be able to analyze the legal framework and policies governing the use of loan-to-use evidence in the criminal justice system in Makassar. In this regard, it is important to understand whether the existing legal and policy framework is sufficiently clear and consistent to facilitate the effective use of proof of use, and whether there is a need to update or improve existing regulations.

References

Afiah, R. N. (1989). Barang Bukti Dalam Proses Pidana. Sinar Grafika.

Alesia Lestari Panjaitan, P., & Perdana, I. (2019). KEKUATAN HUKUM KETERANGAN SAKSI YANG DIBACAKAN DIPERSIDANGAN DITINJAU DARI KITAB UNDANG-UNDANG HUKUM ACARA PIDANA. JURNAL TECTUM, 1(1). http://jurnal.una.ac.id/index.php/jt/article/view/1012

Amir, C. (2021). Perlindungan Hukum Terhadap Benda Sitaan. CV Jakad Media.

Arifin, M. Z., Sumarwoto, & Priambada, B. S. (2021). PELIBATAN TENTARA NASIONAL INDONESIA (TNI) DALAM PENANGANAN TINDAK PIDANA TERORISME. Justicia Journal, 10(2), 88–100. https://ejournal.undar.or.id/index.php/Justicia/article/view/102

Efendi, T. (2014). Hukum Pidana Internasional. Pustaka Yustisia.

Fauzi, S. R., & Dona, F. (2022). Penyidikan Tindak Pidana Pencurian di Polres Purworejo. Jurnal Al-Hakim: Jurnal Ilmiah Mahasiswa, Studi Syariah, Hukum Dan Filantropi, 4(1), 43–64. https://doi.org/10.22515/ALHAKIM.V4I1.5251

Harahap, M. Y. (2002). Pembahasan Permasalahan dan Penerapan KUHAP, Penyidik dan Penuntutan. Sinar Grafika.

Herlianto, S. T. (2014). Constructing Penal Mediation on Medical Malpractice Cases: A Restorative Justice Perspective. Journal of Law, Policy and Globalization, 24. https://heinonline.org/HOL/Page?handle=hein.journals/jawpglob24&id=10&div=&collection=

Irwansyah, I. (2020). Penelitian Hukum (Pilihan Metode & Praktik Penulisan Artikel). Mirra Buana Media.

Kahhat, R., Kim, J., Xu, M., Allenby, B., Williams, E., & Zhang, P. (2012). Article in press. 2008. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.resconrec.2008.03.002

Lu, W., & Yuan, H. (n.d.). A Framework for Understanding Waste Management Studies in Construction. 18.

Mahmud Marzuki, Peter. (2011). Penelitian Hukum. Kencana Prenada Media Group.

Mandjo, J., Taufiq, M., & Sarson, Z. (2021). The Right to Obtain Free Assistance and Legal Protection for The Indigent People Through Legal Assistance Organizations. Jambura Law Review, 3(2), 365–377. https://doi.org/10.33756/JLR.V3I2.9424

Manumpahi, R. B. (2021). PENGEMBALIAN BARANG BUKTI DALAM PENYELESAIAN PERKARA PIDANA BERDASARKAN KUHAP. LEX CRIMEN, 10(5). https://ejournal.unsrat.ac.id/v3/index.php/lexcrimen/article/view/33438

Marpaung, L. (2011). Proses penanganan perkara pidana: Penyelidikan dan penyidikan. Sinar Grafika.

Maskur, M. A., Rasdi, Damayanti, R., & Lestari, E. Y. (2022, February 9). The Convergence of State Administrative Law and Criminal Law in Prevention of Criminal Act of Corruption that is Detrimental to the State Finances in Indonesia. Proceedings of the 4th International Conference on Indonesian Legal Studies. https://doi.org/10.4108/EAI.8-6-2021.2314426

Masnun, M. A. (2018). Legal Protection of the Right to Indication of Origin in Indonesia. Journal of Private and Commercial Law, 2. https://heinonline.org/HOL/Page?handle=hein.journals/jpcl2&id=114&div=&collection=

Miru, A., & Pati, S. (2020). Hukum Perjanjian : Penjelasan Makna Pasal-Pasal Perjanjian Bernama Dalam KUH Perdata (BW). Sinar Grafika.

Munib, M. A. (2018). TINJAUAN YURIDIS KEWENANGAN KEPOLISIAN REPUBLIK INDONESIA DALAM PENYELIDIKAN DAN PENYIDIKAN MENURUT KITAB UNDANG-UNDANG HUKUM ACARA PIDANA. JUSTITIABLE - Jurnal Hukum, 1(1), 60–73. https://ojs.ejournalunigoro.com/index.php/JUSTITIABLE/article/view/42

Nola, L. F. (2017). UPAYA PELINDUNGAN HUKUM SECARA TERPADU BAGI TENAGA KERJA INDONESIA (TKI) (INTEGRATED LEGAL PROTECTION FOR MIGRANT WORKERS). Negara Hukum: Membangun Hukum Untuk Keadilan Dan Kesejahteraan, 7(1), 35–52. https://doi.org/10.22212/JNH.V7I1.949

Rahardjo, S. (2006). Membedah Hukum Progresif. Kompas.

Saing, S. (2013). Analisis Yuridis terhadap Penetapan Majelis Hakim dalam Pelaksanaan Pinjam Pakai Barang Bukti Perkara Tindak Pidana Ditinjau dari Kitab Undang-undang Hukum Acara Pidana Studi di Pengadilan Negeri Singkawang. Jurnal Nestor Magister Hukum, 3(5).

Sumual, C. L. (2018). TANGGUNG JAWAB PENYIDIK TERHADAP BARANG SITAAN YANG DISIMPAN DALAM RUMAH PENYIMPANAN BARANG SITAAN. LEX CRIMEN, 7(6). https://ejournal.unsrat.ac.id/v3/index.php/lexcrimen/article/view/20745

Utoyo, M., Sari, P., & Cayo, N. (2021). PROSES PINJAM PAKAI BARANG BUKTI DALAM PERKARA PIDANA. Disiplin : Majalah Civitas Akademika Sekolah Tinggi Ilmu Hukum Sumpah Pemuda, 27, 252–263. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.6644030

Yustiningsih, I. (2020). Perlindungan Hukum Anak Korban Kekerasan Seksual dari Reviktimisasi dalam Sistem Peradilan Pidana. Lex Renaissance, 5(2), 287–306. https://doi.org/10.20885/JLR.VOL5.ISS2.ART3