Law enforcement obstacles to traffic violations through electronic tips (Etle) in Surakarta

Authors

  • Indah Sundari Pratiwi Universitas Surakarta, Indonesia
  • Asri Agustiwi Universitas Surakarta, Indonesia
  • Bintara Sura Priambada Universitas Surakarta, Indonesia

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.35335/ijopsor.v11i2.116

Keywords:

Electronic Traffic Law, Enforcement, Obstacles, Traffic

Abstract

Industrial Revolution 4.0. The factor of technological change known as digitization technology is transitioning from analog to digital technology and delivering information from analog to binary format. The rapid development of technology and information has encouraged the Police of the Republic of Indonesia to develop an information system supported by a network or website-based software that enables the dissemination of information to every member of the police in real-time. Electronic Traffic Law Enforcement (ETLE) is a sophisticated camera system that can detect traffic violations on the highway. This research aims to discover the obstacles in Enforcing Traffic Violations through Electronic Traffic Law Enforcement (ETLE). To determine the Effectiveness of Law Enforcement Related to Pass Traffic Violations through Electronic Traffic Law Enforcement (ETLE) or Electronic Tickets. The method used in this study uses a qualitative approach. The qualitative method is a method that focuses on in-depth observation by producing a more comprehensive analysis of a phenomenon. Applying ETLE fines and manual ticketing by the police, in this case, Satlantas, is a form of effort to reduce violations. The data obtained in 2022 shows that violations are increasing. This is because the existence of ETLE tickets can be seen for violators. After all, they are recorded with the ETLE camera recorder, and it is also hoped that it will make it easier for violators to resolve the legal problems they face with effective bureaucratic reform and legal certainty regarding fines obtained from fines. By the violator, but this does not rule out the possibility of the traffic police being constrained by something when showing evidence of a ticket to the violator. And other obstacles, both the facilities and infrastructure for the ETLE ticket

Author Biographies

Indah Sundari Pratiwi, Universitas Surakarta, Indonesia

 

 

Asri Agustiwi, Universitas Surakarta, Indonesia

 

 

Bintara Sura Priambada, Universitas Surakarta, Indonesia

 

 

References

Abdullah, F. A., & Windiyastuti, F. (2002). Electronic Traffic Law Enforcement (ETLE) Sebagai Digitalisasi Proses Tilang. Jurnal Kewarganegaraan, 6(2), 39–40.

Arif, B., & Mahmudah. (2007). Rekayasa Lalu Lintas. UNS Press.

Bola, M. (2004). Pedoman Pemeriksaan Perkara Hukum. Fakultas Hukum Universitas Pasundan.

Budhijanto, D. (2014). Peran Hukum Telekomunikasi Terhadap Implikasi Konvergensi Teknologi Informasi dan Komunikasi. Dinamika Hukum, 14(1), 135.

Chazawi, A. (2007). Pelajaran Hukum Pidana. PT. Raja Grafindo: Jakarta.

Gunadi, I., & Jonaedi. (2014). Hukum Pidana. Kencana: Jakarta.

Jainah, Z. O. (2012). Penegakan Hukum Dalam Masyarakat. Jurnal of Rural and Development, 3(2).

Moeljatno. (2009). Asas-Asas Hukum Pidana. Rineka Cipta: Jakarta.

Moleong, L. (2008). Metodologi Penelitian Kualitatif Edisi Revisi. Bandung: PT Remaja Rosdakarya.

Muladi, & Nanawi, A. B. (1984). Penegakan Hukum Pidana. Rineka CIpta: Jakarta.

Mursalim. (2017). Kewenangan Penyidik Polri Dalam Penangangan Tindak Pidana Menurut Kitab Undang-Undang Hukum Acara Pidana . 1(3).

Naning, R. (1983). Menggairahkan Kesadaran Hukum Masyarakat dan Disiplin Penegak Hukum Dalam Lalu LIntas. Bina Ilmu: Surabaya.

Poerwagamminto, W. J. (1989). Kamus Besar Bahasa Indonesia. Jakarta: Balai Pustaka.

Prodjodikoro, W. (2003). Asas-Asas Hukum Pidana. Bandung: Refika Aditama.

Qamar, N. (2011). Supremasi Hukum dan Penegakan Hukum. Jurnal Ilmiah Hukum, 13(2).

Rahardjo, S. (1983). Masalah Penegakan Hukum. Sinar Baru: Bandung.

Raharjo, S. (2005). Ilmu Hukum. Bandung: Citra Aditya Bakti.

Sadjijono. (2013). Seri Hukum Kepolisian Polri dan Good Governance. Laksbang Mediatama, Surabaya.

Setiyanto. (2017). Efektifitas Penegakkan Sanksi Denda E-Tilang Bagi Pelanggar Lalu Lintas Berdasarkan Undang-Undang Nomor 22 Tahun 2009 Tentang Lalu Lintas dan Angkutan Jalan (Studi di Polres Rembang). Hukum Khaira Ummah, 12(4), 742–766.

Shandy, A. U. (2021). Problematika Penegakan Hukum. CV Insan Cendekia Mandiri.

Shant, D. (1988). Konsep Penegakan Hukum. Liberrty: Jakarta.

Soekamto, S. (1976). Penanggulangan Kejahatan. Bandung.

Soekanto, S. (1983). Faktor-Faktor Yang Mempengaruhi Penegakan Hukum. Rajawali Pers : Jakarta.

Soekanto, S. (2021). Faktor-Faktor Yang Mempengaruhi Penegakan Hukum. Depok: Raja Grafindo.

Suharto, & Efendi, J. (2010). Panduan Praktis Bila Menghadapi Perkara Pidana, Mulai Proses Penyelidikan Sampai Persidangan. Jakarta: Prestasi Pustaka.

Downloads

Published

2023-08-21

How to Cite

Pratiwi, I. S. ., Agustiwi, A. ., & Priambada, B. S. . (2023). Law enforcement obstacles to traffic violations through electronic tips (Etle) in Surakarta . The International Journal of Politics and Sociology Research, 11(2), 245–253. https://doi.org/10.35335/ijopsor.v11i2.116