Criminal law policies on activities obstacing the management of Infectious diseases

Mutmainnah; Muhadar; Abd. Assist

doi:10.35335/ijopsor.v11i1.118

Authors

Mutmainnah Universitas Hasanuddin, Indonesia
Muhadar Universitas Hasanuddin, Indonesia
Abd. Assist Universitas Hasanuddin, Indonesia

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.35335/ijopsor.v11i1.118

Keywords:

Criminal Acts, Criminal Law Policy, Health Law, Law Enforcement , Outbreaks of Infectious Diseases

Abstract

The goals of the research include looking at (1) how criminal law approaches behaviors that impede the control of infectious disease epidemics and (2) how such activities are punished. Specifically, a normative statutory approach (statute approach) to legal research is used. Peulis gathers information for her studies by reading widely. Legal research is a method of inquiry that places a premium on statutory and regulatory texts as primary sources. Primary and secondary sources of information are used. Standardized research methodologies are used to evaluate the outcomes of literature reviews, which are then methodically organized and evaluated. The findings demonstrated that (1) Indonesian criminal law contains the criminal law policy towards activities to obstruct the control of infectious disease outbreaks in Law Number 4 of 1984 concerning outbreaks of infectious diseases and Law Number 6 of 2018 concerning health quarantine, and (2) activities to obstruct the management of the outbreak are punishable by imprisonment and fines under Law Number 4 of 1984 concerning infectious disease outbreaks. Overall, researching criminal law policies on activities obstructing the management of infectious diseases is urgent to enhance public health protection, prevent harm, promote behavior change, ensure effective response and preparedness, and address ethical and human rights considerations. The findings from this research can inform policymakers, legal professionals, public health authorities, and other stakeholders in developing and implementing evidence-based measures to safeguard public health during infectious disease outbreaks.

References

Ainah, U. (2021). Penegakan Hukum Terhadap Pelaku Tindak Pidana Kekarantinaan Kesehatan Pada saat Terjadi Kedaruratan Kesehatan di Kota Makassar. Universitas Hasanuddin.

Armaidi, D. (2012). Pedoman Epidemiologi Penyakit Menular dan Tidak Menular. JMJ, 4(2).

Buchori, R. A. Al, Sepud, I. M., & Widyantara, I. M. M. (2021). Sanksi Pidana Terhadap Pelaku Tindak Pidana Santet. Jurnal Preferensi Hukum, 2(3), 454–458. https://doi.org/10.22225/JPH.2.3.3980.454-458

Colin, M. (2013). Cambridge advanced learner’s dictionary. Cambridge University Press. https://scholar.google.com/scholar?hl=en&as_sdt=0,5&q=Cambridge+advanced+Learner%27s+Dictionary,+Cambridge+University+Press

Cross, Noel. (2009). Criminal Law & Criminal Justice : An Introduction. In Criminal Law & Criminal Justice. Sage.

Damayanti, S. (2021). Aspek Pidana Penolakan Pemakaman Jenzah Kasus KOnfirmasi... - Google Scholar. Jusrist-Diction, 4(3).

Donald, A., & Frans, M. (2017). Pengantar Ilmu Hukum. Raja Grafindo Persada.

Handoko, D. (2016). Dekriminalisasi Terhadap Delik-Delik dalam KUHP. Hawa dan Ahwa.

Ilyas, A. (2012). Asas-asas Hukum Pidana Memahami Tindak Pidana dan Pemidanaan. Rangkang Education Yogyakarta & PuKAP Indonesia.

Irwansyah, I. (2020). Penelitian Hukum (Pilihan Metode & Praktik Penulisan Artikel). Mirra Buana Media.

Martin, R. (2016). The Role of Law in Public Health. In The Philosophy of Public Health. CRC Press. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315554716-2/ROLE-LAW-PUBLIC-HEALTH-ROBYN-MARTIN

Moeljanto. (2018). Asas-asas Hukum Pidana. In academia.edu. Rineka Cipta.

O’Malley, P., Thompson, A., & Rainford, J. (2009). ransparency during public health emergencies: from rhetoric to reality. SciELO Public Health. https://doi.org/10.2471/BLT.08.056689

Pratama, F. (2021). Resolusi Tindak Pidana Penyalahgunaan Narkotika (Studi Di Polsek Serbelawan). Jurnal Ilmiah Mahasiswa Hukum [JIMHUM], 1(2). http://jurnalmahasiswa.umsu.ac.id/index.php/jimhum/article/view/212

Ramadhani, R. (2017). JAMINAN KEPASTIAN HUKUM YANG TERKANDUNG DALAM SERTIPIKAT HAK ATAS TANAH. DE LEGA LATA: Jurnal Ilmu Hukum, 2(1), 139–157. https://doi.org/10.30596/DLL.V2I1.1144

Ravena, H. D. (2017). Kebijakan Kriminal (Criminal Policy) . In download.garuda.kemdikbud.go.id (Issue 1). Prenada Media.

Regmi, K., Gilbert, R., & Thunhurst, C. (2015). How can health systems be strengthened to control and prevent an Ebola outbreak? A narrative review. Https://Doi.Org/10.3402/Iee.v5.28877, 5(1). https://doi.org/10.3402/IEE.V5.28877

Setyawati, N. (2020). Implementasi Sanksi Pidana Bagi Masyarakat Yang Beraktivitas Di Luar Rumah Saat Terjadinya Pandemi Covid-19. Universitas Surabaya.

Sinaulan, R. L. (2016). Tindak Pidana Perkawinan Semu (Marriage Of Inconvenience) dalam Perspektif Hukum Islam. Al-Daulah: Jurnal Hukum Dan Perundangan Islam, 6(2), 477–503. https://doi.org/10.15642/AD.2016.6.2.477-503

Smith, K. F., Dobson, A. P., & McKenzie, F. E. (2005). Ecological Theory to Enhance Infectious Disease Control And Public Health Policy. Frontiers in Ecology and the Environment, 3(1). https://esajournals.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1890/1540-9295%282005%29003%5B0029%3AETTEID%5D2.0.CO%3B2

Soekanto, S. (2015). Teori Yang Murni Tentang Hukum . Alumni.

Sofyan, A., & Azisa, N. (2016). Buku Ajar Hukum Pidana. Pustaka Pena Press.

Soponyono, E. (2012). Kebijakan Orientasi Hukum Pidana dalam Ius Constitutum dan Ius Constituendum di Indonesia. Penerbit Pustaka Magister.

Suhariyono, A. R. (2018). Penentuan sanksi pidana dalam suatu undang-undang. Jurnal Legislasi Indonesia, 6(4). https://e-jurnal.peraturan.go.id/index.php/jli/article/viewFile/337/221

Yulianti, S. W. (2022). Kebijakan Penegakan Hukum terhadap Kejahatan Kekerasan Seksual Kepada Anak dalam Sistem Peradilan Pidana di Indonesia. Amnesti Jurnal Hukum, 4(1), 11–29. https://doi.org/10.37729/AMNESTI.V4I1.1399