Legal effects on shareholders who do not make capital deposits in limited liability companies (Case Study of Case Decision Number 191/Pdt.G.2020/PN.Bgr.)

Authors

  • Revi Laracaka Universitas Indonesia, Indonesia

Keywords:

Capital, Capital Deposit, Limited Liability Company, Shares

Abstract

This research examines the provisions regarding capital payment, the legal status of shareholders who fail to fulfill their capital payment obligations in a limited liability company, and analyzes the judge's considerations in stating that Edy Susanto is not entitled to be recognized as a shareholder because he has never made actual capital payment into the company. The results of this research indicate that according to the Company Law, capital payment provisions must be fulfilled in full and cannot be paid in installments after the Limited Liability Company is legally established. Shareholders who have never made capital payment after the establishment of the Limited Liability Company cannot be recognized as legitimate shareholders, and the judge's consideration in stating that Edy Susanto cannot be recognized as a shareholder of PT Berdikari Sukses Makmur is an appropriate consideration. To prevent such issues from occurring in the future, the government should improve the provisions in the Company Law by stating that if there is a violation of capital payment, the directors responsible for the violation of capital payment provisions should be held accountable, and the company should have the authority to demand such obligations through negotiation or legal action.

References

Ahmad Mufti, dkk. (2019). “Pertanggungjawaban Pimpinan BUMD/BUMN Berbentuk Perseroan Terbatas dalam Penyelesaian Tindak Pidana Korupsi. De Jure Jurnal Ilmiah Ilmu Hukum , 1, 68.

Ahmad Yani, & Gunawan Widjaja. (2012a). Peran Strategis Bank Syariah sebagai Sumber Pembiayaan Alternatif bagi Usaha Mikro di Indonesia Berdasarkan Undang-Undang Nomor 21 Tahun 2008. 51.

Ahmad yani, & Gunawan Widjaja. (2012a). Peran Strategis Bank Syariah sebagai Sumber Pembiayaan Alternatif bagi Usaha Mikro di Indonesia Berdasarkan Undang-Undang Nomor 21 Tahun 2008. 51.

Ahmad Yani, & Gunawan Widjaja. (2012b). Seri Hukum Bisnis Perseroan Terbatas. 13.

Ahmad yani, & Gunawan Widjaja. (2012b). This opinion is based on the definition of Subscriber in Black’s Law Dictionary which is defined as follows "one becomes bound by a subscription to the capital stock of a corporation. A person who has agreed to purchase shares, either before or after incorporation, whereas Subscription is “a written contract by which a person is bound to take and pay for the capital stock of a corporation...” 49.

Andrew Shandy Utama, & Dewi Sartika. (2017). Peran Strategis Bank Syariah sebagai Sumber Pembiayaan Alternatif bagi Usaha Mikro di Indonesia Berdasarkan Undang-Undang Nomor 21 Tahun 2008. Jurnal Al-Amwal, 6(2), 60.

Dewi Oktavia, & Irene Svinarky. (2021). , Analisis Yuridis Kedudukan Surat Pernyataan Setor Modal Sebagai Pengganti Bukti Setor Modal Dalam Pendirian Perseroan Terbatas Di Indonesia. Jurnal Gagasan Hukum Universitas Putera Batam, 63–64.

Frans Satrio Wicaksono. (2009). Tanggungjawab Pemegang Saham, Direksi dan Komisari Perseroan Terbatas. Jakarta: Vismedia.

Gary A. Moore. (n.d.). The Legal Environtment Of Business: A Contextual Approach. South Western.

Gatot Supramono. (1996). Hukum Perseroan Terbatas yang Baru. Jakarta: djambatan.

Handri Raharjo. (2013). Hukum Perseroan Terbatas. Yogyakarta: Pustaka Yusticia.

Ida Bagus Putra Pratama, & Made Dedy Priyanto. (n.d.). Kepastian Hukum Modal Dasar Pendirian Perseroan Terbatas Berdasarkan Peraturan Pemerintah Perubahan Modal Dasar Perseroan Terbatas. Bali: Fakultas Hukum Universitas Udayana.

Indonesia. Undang-Undang tentang Perseroan Terbatas, Ps. 33 ayat 3 dan Penjelasan.

M. Yahya Harahap. (n.d.). Hukum Perseroan Terbatas. Jakarta : Sinar Grafika.

Munir Fuady. (2018). Hukum Perusahaan dalam Paradigma Hukum Bisnis. Bandung: Citra Aditya Bakti.

Putusan Pengadilan Negeri Bogor Nomor 191/Pdt.G.2020/PN tanggal 5 Mei 2021. (n.d.).

Ridwan Khairandy. (2014). Pokok-Pokok Hukum Dagang Indonesia (2nd ed.). Yogyakarta: FH UII Press.

Sandra Dewi. (2020). Application of the Principle of Piercing The Corporate Veil in Resolving Corporate Responsibility Cases in Indonesia. International Journal of Law and Public Policy, 2(2), 67.

Sjawie, H. F. (2017). Tanggungjawab Direksi Persero.Terbatas Atas Tindakan Ultra Vires. Jurnal Hukum Prioris, 6(1), 12.

Sri Mamudji. (2005a). Metode Penelitian dan Penulisan Hukum. Jakarta: Badan Penerbit Fakultas Hukum Universitas Indonesia.

Sri Mamudji. (2005b). Metode Penelitian dan Penulisan Hukum. Jakarta : Badań Penerbit Fakultas Hukum Universitas Indonesia.

Sri Redjeki Hartono. (1985). Bentuk Bentuk Kerjasama Dalam Dunia Niaga. Semarang: Fakultas Hukum Universitas 17 Agustus 1945 Semarang.

Steven R. Schult. (1983). Dutch Business Law (This opinion is based on the provisions of Article 180 paragraph (2) of the Dutch Burgerlijk Wetboek). Amsterdam: Kluwer Deventer.

Undang-Undang Nomor 40 Tahun 2007tentang Perseroan Terbatas, L.N. Tahun 2007 Nomor 106, TLN 4756, Ps. 1 ayat (1).

Undang-Undang Perseroan Terbatas, Ps. 33 ayat (3).

Undang-Undang tentang Perseroan Terbatas, Penjelasan Umum. (n.d.).

Undang-Undang tentang Perseroan Terbatas, Ps. 26. (n.d.).

Undang-Undang tentang Perseroan Terbatas. Ps. 33 ayat 1. (n.d.).

Undang-Undang tentang Perseroan Terbatas, Ps. 33 ayat 2.

William J. Filstead. (1978). Qualitative Methode: A Needed Perspective in Evaluation Research dalam Thomas D. Cook dan Charles S. Reichard, eds., Qualitative and Quantitative Research in Evaluation Research. London: Sage Publication.

Downloads

Published

2023-09-20

How to Cite

Laracaka, R. (2023). Legal effects on shareholders who do not make capital deposits in limited liability companies (Case Study of Case Decision Number 191/Pdt.G.2020/PN.Bgr.). The International Journal of Politics and Sociology Research, 11(2), 381–387. Retrieved from https://ijobsor.pelnus.ac.id/index.php/ijopsor/article/view/137