Inconsistency in judges' legal considerations addressing special narcotics crimes

Muhamad Romdoni; Fathullah Fathullah; Mawarni Fatma; Zulfikri Darwis

doi:10.35335/ijopsor.v11i1.147

Authors

Muhamad Romdoni Universitas Primagraha, Indonesia
Fathullah Fathullah Universitas Primagraha, Indonesia
Mawarni Fatma Universitas Gajah Putih, Indonesia
Zulfikri Darwis Institut Islam Muhammadiyah Kotamobagu, Indonesia

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.35335/ijopsor.v11i1.147

Keywords:

Decision, Inconsistency, Judge, Narcotics

Abstract

The judge's legal considerations must be based on theories, jurisprudence, doctrine, trial evidence, and anything else that can clarify the case. Inconsistency in evaluating cases managed by judges in the same court for the same crime, however, can lead to inequity by imposing different sanctions. This study's objective is to examine the legal considerations judges take into account when resolving cases and issuing court decisions. This study employs a normative methodology with a comparative and statutory approach. The obtained data is then deductively processed and descriptively analyzed. The findings of this study indicate that the various judicial considerations contributed to the production of an unjust decision. This is evident from the decision number 273/Pid.Sus/2022/PN-Srg. This is due to the inconsistency of the judge's legal considerations, which leads to disparities in sentencing for narcotics-related offenses. This research shows that the regulations regarding narcotics in Indonesia are not optimal because judges as God's representatives on earth have not been able to provide the expected justice

References

Alrosid, E. H. (2020). Legal Considerations of The Judges In Narcotics Rehabilitation Decisions (Analysis of Decisions Number: 112 / Pid.Sus / 2018 / PN.Pwt.). UMPurwokerto Law Review, 1(2), 62. https://doi.org/10.30595/umplr.v1i2.8664

Asyharudddin, M., Badaru, B., & Hidjaz, M. K. (2020). Analisis Sanksi Pidana Terhadap Pelaku Tindak Pidana Narkotika. PLENO JURE, 9(1), 58–71. https://doi.org/10.37541/plenojure.v9i1.390

Bastiar, D. (2019). Penegakan Hukum Terhadap Penyalahgunaan dan Pencegahan Pengguna Narkotika di Indonesia. Jurnal Rechtens, 8(2), 209–222.

Dewi, S. D. R., & Monita, Y. (2021). Pertimbangan Hakim dalam Putusan Perkara Tindak Pidana Narkotika. PAMPAS: Journal of Criminal Law, 1(1), 125–137. https://doi.org/10.22437/pampas.v1i1.8314

Diyono, D., & Purnawan, A. (2020). Judges Existencing In The Judicial Process Of Narcotics Criminal Actors. Law Development Journal, 2(3), 323. https://doi.org/10.30659/ldj.2.3.323-330

Hiariej, E. O. S. (2012). Teori & Hukum Pembuktian (Y. S. Hayati, Ed.). Erlangga.

Hiariej, E. O. S. (2014). Prinsip-Prinsip Hukum Pidana. Cahaya Atma Pustaka.

Ignjatović, Đ. (2020). Organized crime and narcotics introductory clarifications. Crimen, 11(3), 235–254. https://doi.org/10.5937/crimen2003235I

Irmawan, D. D., & Mashdurohatun, A. (2018). Disparities Criminal Case Against Judge’s Decision In Crime Of Narcotics Abuse Viewed From The Purpose Of Criminal Law. Jurnal Daulat Hukum, 1(4), 973. https://doi.org/10.30659/jdh.v1i4.4141

Komalasari, R., Nurhayati, N., & Mustafa, C. (2021). KEADILAN BAGI PENYALAHGUNA NARKOTIKA DI INDONESIA. Arena Hukum, 14(3), 479–499. https://doi.org/10.21776/ub.arenahukum.2021.01403.4

Manurung, F., Syahrin, A., Ablisar, M., & Sunarmi, S. (2021). Disparitas Putusan Hakim Terhadap Tindak Pidana Narkotika Di Wilayah Hukum Pengadilan Negeri Rantauprapat (Studi Kasus Putusan No. 159/Pid.Sus/2019/Pn.Rap Dan Putusan No. 626/Pid.Sus/2020/Pn.Rap). Law Jurnal, 2(1), 62–80. https://doi.org/10.46576/lj.v2i1.1451

Mertokusumo, S. (2019). Mengenal Hukum. Cahaya Atma Pustaka.

Muladi, & Arief, B. N. (2005). Teori-Teori dan Kebijakan Pidana. PT. Alumni.

Nasrullah, N. (2020). Putusan Hakim terhadap Pemberian Sanksi di Bawah Batas Minimal pada Tindak Pidana Narkotika. SIGn Jurnal Hukum, 2(1), 1–19. https://doi.org/10.37276/sjh.v2i1.59

Ricadonna, B. B. (2022). Peranan Hakim Dalam Penjatuhan Sanksi Pidana Pecandu Terhadap Penyalahgunaan Narkotika. Jurnal JURISTIC, 3(01), 1. https://doi.org/10.35973/jrs.v3i01.2957

Ristikowati, M., & Hanim, L. (2021). The Implementation of Criminal Sanctions on Criminal Acts of Narcotics. Law Development Journal, 3(4), 790. https://doi.org/10.30659/ldj.3.4.790-798

Romdoni, M. (2022). The Reconstitution of Death Criminal Imposition against Persons of Criminal Actions on Narcotics Post-Decision of the Constitutional Court Number 2-3/PUU-V/2007. www.legal.isha.or.id/index.php/legal

Romdoni, M., & Fitriasih, S. (2022). Disparitas Pemidanaan Dalam Kasus Tindak Pidana Khusus Narkotika Di Pengadilan Negeri Tangerang. Masalah-Masalah Hukum, 51(3), 287–298. https://doi.org/10.14710/mmh.51.3.2022.287-298

Ronaldi, E., Ali, D., & Mujibussalim, M. (2019). Implikasi Putusan Hakim Dalam Penetapan Sanksi Di Bawah Minimum Terhadap Tindak Pidana Narkotika. Syiah Kuala Law Journal, 3(1), 129–146. https://doi.org/10.24815/sklj.v3i1.12152

Santoso, T. (2020). Hukum Pidana (Suatu Pengantar). PT RajaGrafindo Persada.

Satrya Manulung Bansage Immanuel Paparang, & Dian Adriawan Daeng Tawang. (2022). Ratio Decidendi Putusan Hakim Yang Berbeda Dari Kasus Sejenis Dalam Delik Narkotika. Reformasi Hukum Trisakti, 4(5), 1285–1294. https://doi.org/10.25105/refor.v4i5.15134

Setyawan, R., & Anton, H. S. (2019). Kewenangan Penyidik Menetapkan Rehabilitasi tanpa Penetapan Pengadilan pada Kasus Penyalahgunaan Narkotika. Jurnal Yustika, 22(1), 11–25.

Syachdin, S. (n.d.). Application Of The Ultimum Remedium Principle To The Children Involved In Narcotic. http://jurnal.untad.ac.id/index.php/TLR

Yakin, N. (2020). Tujuan Pemidanaan Dan Pertimbangan Hakim Dalam Menjatuhkan Pidana Terhada Pengguna Sekaligus Pengedar Narkotika. Indonesian Journal of Criminal Law and Criminology (IJCLC), 1(1), 20–32. https://doi.org/10.18196/ijclc.v1i1.9103

Zuniarto, H. (2020). Pertimbangan Hakim dalam Menjatuhkan Putusan Denda Bersifat Minimum Khusus dalam Delik Narkotika. Jurnal Lex Renaissance, 5(2). https://doi.org/10.20885/JLR.vol5.iss2.art5