The existence of policy regulations and the court's authority to review policy regulations (beleidsregel)
Keywords:
Policy, Policy Regulations, ReviewAbstract
Policy regulation (beleidsregel) is a legal product that is based on the expertise/discretion of the government in making policies because of the law. Policy regulations are outlined in various forms, including in the form of circulars, guidelines, announcements, decrees that are general and abstract in nature and even in the form of regulations which are referred to as pseudo regulations (pseudo legislation). Legal developments then gave birth to policy regulations that were formed based on the mandate of statutory regulations. In a rule-of-law state, every policy that binds society must be subject to review in court, including policy regulations, which then creates differences of opinion about who has the authority to implement policy regulations, bearing in mind that until now there are no laws and regulations that regulate rigidly regarding the formation policy regulations and their testing mechanisms.
References
Barzelay, M. (1992). Breaking through bureaucracy: A new vision for managing in government. Univ of California Press.
Blades, L. E. (2013). Employment at will vs. individual freedom: On limiting the abusive exercise of employer power. In Contract-Freedom and Restraint (pp. 200–231). Routledge.
Budianto, A. (2020). Legal research methodology reposition in research on social science. International Journal of Criminology and Sociology, 9(1), 1339–1346.
Cucić, V. (2011). Administrative appeal in Serbian law. Transylvanian Review of Administrative Sciences, 7(32), 50–73.
Deacon, B. (2007). Global social policy and governance. Sage.
Firmansyah, A. A., & Evendia, M. (2022). CONVERGENCE DISCUSSION FOR THE FORMATION OF POLICY REGULATIONS IN REGULATION OF LOCAL LAW PRODUCTS. Kanun Jurnal Ilmu Hukum, 24(3), 291–308.
Frank, J. (1931). Are judges human? Part one: The effect on legal thinking of the assumption that judges behave like human beings. University of Pennsylvania Law Review and American Law Register, 80(1), 17–53.
Hamid, A. (2020). Questioning the Leadership and Preferences of Regional Heads in Determining Minimum Wage. International Journal of Scientific Research and Management, 8(9), 251–265.
Hani, T. M. (2021). Disharmony in Regulations of Telemedicine Services During the Covid-19 Pandemic in Indonesia. MIMBAR Jurnal Sosial Dan Pembangunan, 37(2), 142–149.
Häyrinen, K., Saranto, K., & Nykänen, P. (2008). Definition, structure, content, use and impacts of electronic health records: a review of the research literature. International Journal of Medical Informatics, 77(5), 291–304.
Kass, N. E. (2001). An ethics framework for public health. American Journal of Public Health, 91(11), 1776–1782.
Keputusan Menteri Pekerjaan Umum dan Perumahan Rakyat (PUPR) No. 710/KPTS/M/2018 tentang Perubahan atas Keputusan Menteri PUPR No. 382/KPTS/M/2018 tentang Penetapan Golongan Jenis Kendaraan Bermotor, Tarif, dan Sistem Pengumpulan Tol Secara Integrasi pada Jalan Tol JORR.
Kerwin, C. M., & Furlong, S. R. (2018). Rulemaking: How government agencies write law and make policy. Cq Press.
Nelson, C. (2006). The Persistence of General Law. Columbia Law Review, 503–568.
Ng, A., & Loosemore, M. (2007). Risk allocation in the private provision of public infrastructure. International Journal of Project Management, 25(1), 66–76.
Offe, C. (1987). II. Democracy against the welfare state? Structural foundations of neoconservative political opportunities. Political Theory, 15(4), 501–537.
Putra, H. K., Istislam, I., & Widiarto, A. E. (2020). Legis ratio of minister regulation arrangement in law number 15 of 2019 about the amendment to law number 12 of 2011. International Journal of Research in Business and Social Science (2147-4478), 9(3), 182–190.
Peraturan Mahkamah Agung Nomor 6 Tahun 2018 tentang Pedoman Penyelesaian Sengketa Administrasi Pemerintahan Setelah Menempuh Upaya Administratif
Peraturan Pemerintah Nomor 36 Tahun 2021 Tentang Pengupahan
Peraturan Pemerintah Nomor 78 Tahun 2015 Tentang Pengupahan
Putusan Mahkamah Agung Nomor 12 P/HUM/2019 tanggal 16 Mei 2019
Putusan Pengadilan Tata Usaha Negara Bandung Nomor: 145/G/2019/PTUN-BDG tanggal 28 Juli 2020
Richman, D. C. (1998). Federal criminal law, congressional delegation, and enforcement discretion. UCLA L. Rev., 46, 757.
Rinaldi, S. M., Peerenboom, J. P., & Kelly, T. K. (2001). Identifying, understanding, and analyzing critical infrastructure interdependencies. IEEE Control Systems Magazine, 21(6), 11–25.
Rizzo, M. J. (2022). Construal level theory and the rule of law: The erosion of biases by abstract rules. Journal of European Public Policy, 29(12), 1934–1946.
Rubin, E. L. (1989). Law and legislation in the administrative state. Colum. L. Rev., 89, 369.
Sadat, A. (2020). Discretion and Accountability of Local Government in Administering Governance. Journal of Governance, 5(2), 237–248.
Saija, V., & Simatauw, A. (2020). Religious Education Service For Students of Indigenous Religion of Nualu. Proceedings of the First International Conference on Christian and Inter Religious Studies, ICCIRS 2019, December 11-14 2019, Manado, Indonesia.
Surat Edaran Mahkamah Agung Nomor 1 Tahun 2017 Tentang Pemberlakuan Rumusan Hasil Rapat Pleno Kamar Mahkamah Agung Tahun 2017 Sebagai Pedoman Pelaksanaan Tugas Bagi Pengadilan.
Surat Edaran Nomor 4 Tahun 2014 Tentang Pemberlakuan Rumusan Hasil Rapat Pleno Kamar Mahkamah Agung Tahun 2013.
Tandungan, E., & Parinussa, E. (2021). Implementation of Dynamic Governance Concept Through Discretion Policy in Facing the National Emergency of Covid-19 in Indonesia. Proceedings of the First International Conference on Economics, Business and Social Humanities, ICONEBS 2020, November 4-5, 2020, Madiun, Indonesia.
Taylor, J. B. (1993). Discretion versus policy rules in practice. Carnegie-Rochester Conference Series on Public Policy, 39, 195–214.
Undang-Undang Dasar Negara Republik Indonesia Tahun 1945
Undang-Undang Nomor 30 Tahun 2014 Tentang Administrasi Pemerintahan
Undang-Undang Nomor 38 Tahun 2004 Tentang Jalan
Undang-Undang Nomor 5 Tahun 1986 Tentang Peradilan Tata Usaha Negara
Undang-Undang Nomor 51 Tahun 2009 tentang Perubahan Kedua Undang-Undang Nomor 5 Tahun 1986 tentang Peradilan Tata Usaha Negara
Undang-Undang Nomor 9 Tahun 2004 tentang Perubahan atas Undang-Undang Nomor 5 Tahun 1986 tentang Peradilan Tata Usaha Negara
Volokh, E. (2004). Speech as conduct: Generally applicable laws, illegal courses of conduct, situation-altering utterances, and the uncharted zones. Cornell L. Rev., 90, 1277.
Widijowati, D. (2016). Determining Criminal Actions in Corruption: The characteristics of Freies Ermessen Principles. The Southeast Asia Law Journal, 2(1), 56–63.
Wright, J. P., & Beaver, K. M. (2005). Do parents matter in creating self‐control in their children? A genetically informed test of Gottfredson and Hirschi’s theory of low self‐control. Criminology, 43(4), 1169–1202.
Yuliartini, N. P. R. (2021). Legal Protection of Women And Children From Violence In The Perspective Of Regional Regulation of Buleleng Regency Number 5 Year 2019. Jurnal Pendidikan Kewarganegaraan Undiksha, 9(1), 89–96.
