Juridical analysis of legal protection for online fintech debtors “Cash Maju”

Authors

  • Monica Maya Franscisca Universitas Pelita Harapan Surabaya, Indonesia
  • Sari Mandiana Universitas Pelita Harapan, Indonesia
  • Andyna Susiawati Achmad Universitas Pelita Harapan, Indonesia

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.35335/ijopsor.v11i2.169

Keywords:

Ilegal fintech, Legal protection, Online lending

Abstract

Cash Maju is one of the Fintech Lending Applications that offers accounts receivable online. In the implementation of online accounts receivable practices, it should be in accordance with the provisions of POJK Number 10 of 2022. Data collection is carried out by researching library materials or secondary materials. The approach taken is through the Law (statute approach) by examining each related Law and regulation, and through a conceptual approach, which is an approach carried out by looking at the doctrines of legal experts contained in the literature. The results of the analysis of this final project show that the establishment of online loans should obtain a business license from the OJK in accordance with the provisions of Article 8 of POJK Number 10 of 2022. Cash Maju is an illegal lending and borrowing application and can be subject to PMH in Article 1365 of the Civil Code. The agreement between Cash Maju and debtor Asep Sunandar is an invalid agreement because it violates the fourth condition of 1320 of the Civil Code. Cash Maju's action of disseminating Asep Sunandar's personal data is defamation as stated in Article 27 of the ITE Law so that Asep Sunandar gets legal protection from the ITE Law.

References

Akyuwen, R., Nanere, M., & Ratten, V. (2021). Technology entrepreneurship: fintech lending in Indonesia. In Studies on entrepreneurship, structural change and industrial dynamics: Entrepreneurial innovation-strategy and competition ascpect.

Amiruddin, A., & Tjoa, K. H. (2006). Pengantar metode penelitian hukum. Raja Grafindo Persada.

Apeldoorn, M. J. van. (2015). Pengantar ilmu hukum. Balai Pustaka.

Busro, A. (2013). Kapita selekta hukum perjanjian. Pohon Cahaya.

Cermati. (2021). Bunga pinjaman online terbaru dan cara menghitungnya. Cermati. https://www.cermati.com/artikel/bunga-pinjaman-online-terbaru-dan-cara-menghitungnya

Chyntya, C. (2022). Ilegal. Firma Hukum: Konspirasi Keadilan. https://konspirasikeadilan.id/artikel/ilegal6807

Departemen Komunikasi Bank Indonesia. (2018). Mengenal financial teknologi. Bank Indonesia: Bank Sentral Republik Indonesia. https://www.bi.go.id/id/edukasi/Pages/mengenal-Financial-Teknologi.aspx

Fitri, W., Priyono, F. D., & Turisno, B. E. (2022). The juridical review on legal position of illegal online loans based on Article 1320 of the Civil Code (Burgerlijk Wetboek). Baltic Journal of Law & Politics, 15(7), 356–367. https://doi.org/10.2478/bjlp-2022-007025

Gatot, S. (2013). Perjanjian utang piutang. Prenada Media Group.

Hadjon, P. M. (1997). Pengkajian ilmu hukum dogmatik (normatif). Yuridika, 8(1). https://e-journal.unair.ac.id/YDK/article/view/5762

Hamdani, F., & Fauzia, A. (2021). The urgency of legal protection for online loan service users. Proceedings of the 2nd International Conference on Law and Human Rights 2021 (ICLHR 2021), 215–221.

Hsueh, S.-C., & Kuo, C.-H. (2017). Effective matching for P2P lending by mining strong association rules. 3rd International Conference on Industrial and Business Engineering (ICIBE), 30–33.

Indayatun, R., & Suryadi, P. (2022). Consumer Protection in Buying and Selling Online. Proceedings of the 2nd International Conference on Law, Social Science, Economics, and Education (ICLSSEE), 1–6. https://doi.org/10.4108/eai.16-4-2022.2320132

Koto, I. (2021). Cyber crime according to the ITE Law. International Journal Reglement & Society (IJRS), 2(2), 103–110. http://jurnal.bundamediagrup.co.id/index.php/ijrs/article/view/124

Marzuki, P. M. (2013). Penelitian hukum. Media Group.

Media Konsumen. (2022). Pinjam 1,2 juta di pinjol Cash Maju, bunganya 1,2 Juta. Media Konsumen. https://mediakonsumen.com/2022/10/08/surat-pembaca/pinjam-12-juta-di-pinjol-cash-maju-bunganya-12-juta

Mezak, M. H. (2006). Jenis, metode dan pendekatan dalam penelitian hukum. Law Review, 5(3), 85–97.

Noptabi, I. S., Aprita, S., & Wulandari, M. (2022). Legal protection of personal data financial technology based online loans from the consumer protection act. Walisongo Law Review (Walrev), 4(1), 121–134. https://doi.org/10.21580/WALREV.2022.4.1.11135

Otoritas Jasa Keuangan. (2017). Direktori Fintech. https://www.ojk.go.id/id/kanal/iknb/data-dan-statistik/direktori/fintech/Default.aspx

Otoritas Jasa Keuangan. (2022). Satgas waspada investasi kembali temukan 10 entitas investasi ilegal dan 100 pinjaman online ilegal. https://www.ojk.go.id/waspada-investasi/id/siaran-pers/Pages/Satgas-Waspada-Investasi-Kentitas-Investasi-Ilegal-dan-100-Pinjaman-Online-Ilegal.aspx

Pratama, K. J. (2019). The indonesian legal paradigm concept about Tort Law (analyse toward court decision number: 42/PDT.G/2014/PN.BYL). SSRN Electronic Journal, 1–9. https://doi.org/10.2139/SSRN.3500712

Pratiwi, N. M. A., Budiartha, I. N. P., & Styawati, N. K. A. (2021). Akibat hukum perjanjian pinjam-meminjam uang yang dinyatakan batal demi hukum. Jurnal Konstruksi Hukum, 2(2), 367–372. https://doi.org/10.22225/jkh.2.2.3257.367-372

Priyono, E. A., Budiharto, B., & Wulandari, A. H. (2019). Regulations for e-commerce agreement according to ict act and title III of indonesian civil code. Diponegoro Law Review, 4(1), 76–88. https://ejournal.undip.ac.id/index.php/dlr/article/view/24237/15682

Salvasani, A., & Kholil, M. (2020). Penanganan terhadap Financial Technology Peer-To-Peer lending Ilegal melalui Otoritas Jasa Keuangan (studi pada OJK Jakarta Pusat). Jurnal Privat Law, 2(2020), 252–259.

Setiawan, R. (1987). Empat kriteria perbuatan melawan hukum dan perkembangan dalam yurisprudensi. Varia Peradilan, 16(2).

Wajuba, L., Fisabilillah, P., & Hanifa, N. (2021). Analisis pengaruh fintech lending terhadap perekonomian Indonesia. Indonesian Journal of Economics, Entrepreneurship and Innovation, 1(3), 2721–8287. https://doi.org/10.31960/ijoeei.v1i3.866

Downloads

Published

2023-09-05

How to Cite

Franscisca, M. M. ., Mandiana, S. ., & Achmad, A. S. . (2023). Juridical analysis of legal protection for online fintech debtors “Cash Maju”. The International Journal of Politics and Sociology Research, 11(2), 304–310. https://doi.org/10.35335/ijopsor.v11i2.169