Leadership, corruption, and inequality: Village development in a non-democratic context
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.35335/ijopsor.v12i4.270Keywords:
Autocracy, Corruption, Democracy, Exclusion, LeadershipAbstract
This article explores the dynamics of non-democratic political leadership and its implications for development management in Mawu Village, Ambalawi Sub-district, Bima Regency, West Nusa Tenggara Province, Indonesia. In many developing countries, including Indonesia, authoritarian leadership is still a common practice in village governance, although its impact on village development has yet to be studied in depth. This study seeks to fill this knowledge gap by analyzing how centralized leadership impacts resource allocation, transparency, and corruption at the local level. Applying a case study approach, the authors collected the data through in-depth interviews and observations. The results show that the concentration of power in a handful of village elites results in unfair and non-transparent resource management, exacerbating socio-economic inequality in the community. Systematic corrupt practices further hamper sustainable development, erode public trust in village governance, and strengthen oppressive power structures. The findings are expected to serve as a foundation for more inclusive and accountable policy formulation in the context of village development, particularly in areas with non-democratic governance.
References
Ajie, H. A., & Wokekoro, O. E. (2012). The impact of corruption on sustainable economic growth and development in Nigeria. International Journal of Economic Development Research and Investment, 3(1), 91–109.
Ansell, C., Sørensen, E., & Torfing, J. (2022). Co-creation for sustainability: The UN SDGs and the power of local partnerships. Emerald Publishing.
Antlöv, H. (2003). Village government and rural development in Indonesia: The new democratic framework. Bulletin of Indonesian Economic Studies, 39(2), 193–214. https://doi.org/10.1080/00074910302013
Aspinall, E., & Berenschot, W. (2019). Democracy for sale: Elections, clientelism, and the state in Indonesia. Cornell University Press.
Bernard, T., Collion, M. H., de Janvry, A., Rondot, P., & Sadoulet, E. (2008). Do village organizations make a difference in African rural development? A study for Senegal and Burkina Faso. World Development, 36(11), 2188–2204. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.worlddev.2007.10.010
Creswell, J. W. (2013). Qualitative inquiry and research design: Choosing among five approaches. SAGE Publications.
Croese, S., Oloko, M., Simon, D., & Valencia, S. C. (2021). Bringing the global to the local: The challenges of multi-level governance for global policy implementation in Africa. International Journal of Urban Sustainable Development, 13(3), 435–447. https://doi.org/10.1080/19463138.2021.1958335
Fung, A. (2015). Putting the public back into governance: The challenges of citizen participation and its future. Public Administration Review, 75(4), 513–522. https://doi.org/10.1111/puar.12361
Grimmelikhuijsen, S., Porumbescu, G., Hong, B., & Im, T. (2013). The effect of transparency on trust in government: A cross-national comparative experiment. Public Administration Review, 73(4), 575–586. https://www.jstor.org/stable/42003079
Helms, L. (2020). Leadership succession in politics: The democracy/autocracy divide revisited. British Journal of Politics and International Relations, 22(2), 328–346. https://doi.org/10.1177/1369148120908528
Hidayat, R. (2019). Public distrust and environmental citizenship: Primary impetuses of radical protest in Bima District, 2011-2012. Jurnal Ilmu Sosial Dan Ilmu Politik, 22(3), 187–200. https://doi.org/10.22146/JSP.35981
Hidayat, R., Hendra, H., & Iptidaiyah, M. (2019). The steep road to institutionalizing negotiable governance in the management of village development. Journal of Governance, 4(1), 45–67. https://doi.org/10.31506/jog.v4i1.5369
Hidayat, R., & Sauki, M. (2023). Studi derajat partisipasi dan literasi anggaran kelompok rentan dalam pengelolaan pembangunan desa. Journal of Governance and Local Politics, 5(1), 33–39. https://doi.org/10.47650/jglp.v5i1.801
Huntington, S. P. (2017). Modernization and corruption. In A. J. Heidenheimer & M. Johnston (Eds.), Political corruption: Concepts and contexts (pp. 253-264). Taylor and Francis. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315126647-24
Ignazi, P. (2014). Power and the (il)legitimacy of political parties: An unavoidable paradox of contemporary democracy? Party Politics, 20(2), 160–169. https://doi.org/10.1177/1354068813519970
Kabir, M. A., & Alam, N. (2021). The efficacy of democracy and freedom in fostering economic growth. Emerging Economy Studies, 7(1), 76–93. https://doi.org/10.1177/23949015211057942
Lall, R. (2023). Making global governance accountable: Civil society, states, and the politics of reform. American Journal of Political Science. https://doi.org/10.1111/ajps.12824
Ledyaev, V., & Chirikova, A. (2020). Business in the power structure of small Russian towns. Europe - Asia Studies, 72(4), 686–711. https://doi.org/10.1080/09668136.2019.1626349
Lewis, B. D. (2015). Decentralizing to villages in Indonesia: Money (and other) mistakes. Public Administration and Development, 35(5), 347–359. https://doi.org/10.1002/pad.1741
Liu, Y., & Yang, W. (2019). Leadership and governance tools for village sustainable development in China. Sustainability (Switzerland), 11(20). https://doi.org/10.3390/su11205553
Loureiro, P. M., & Horta, H. (2024). Who engages whom?—Deficit communication in participatory science governance as democratic deficit. Science and Public Policy, 51(4), 721–733. https://doi.org/10.1093/scipol/scae014
Mukunto, K. I. (2024). Bad governance, political competition and economic inequality as causes of violence. In G. Harris (Ed.), The Elgar companion to war, conflict and peacebuilding in Africa (pp. 13–24). Edward Elgar Publishing. https://doi.org/10.4337/9781802207798
Naeem, M., Ozuem, W., Howell, K., & Ranfagni, S. (2023). A step-by-step process of thematic analysis to develop a conceptual model in qualitative research. International Journal of Qualitative Methods, 22, 1–18. https://doi.org/10.1177/16094069231205789
Otusanya, O. J. (2011). Corruption as an obstacle to development in developing countries: A review of literature. Journal of Money Laundering Control, 14(4), 387–422. https://doi.org/10.1108/13685201111173857
Pandeya, G. P. (2015). Does citizen participation in local government decision-making contribute to strengthening local planning and accountability systems? An empirical assessment of stakeholders’ perceptions in Nepal. International Public Management Review, 16(1), 67. https://ipmr.net/index.php/ipmr/article/view/247
Priya, A. (2021). Case study methodology of qualitative research: Key attributes and navigating the conundrums in its application. Sociological Bulletin, 70(1), 94–110. https://doi.org/10.1177/0038022920970318
Rashid, Y., Rashid, A., Warraich, M. A., Sabir, S. S., & Waseem, A. (2019). Case study method: A step-by-step guide for business researchers. International Journal of Qualitative Methods, 18. https://doi.org/10.1177/1609406919862424
Rehman, M. S. ur, Waheed, K. Z., Munir, S., & Gul, F. (2024). Socio-economic development analysis: A comparative study of democratic versus autocratic governance in Pakistan. Pakistan Journal of Humanities and Social Sciences, 12(1), 859–870. https://doi.org/10.52131/pjhss.2024.v12i1.2145
Rifai, R., Kamaluddin, K., & Hidayat, R. (2024). Exploring the roots and solutions of maladministration, power abuse, or corruption in contemporary Indonesian villages. Pertanika Journal of Social Sciences and Humanities, 32(3), 1115–1140. https://doi.org/10.47836/pjssh.32.3.15
Schilling, J., Saulich, C., & Engwicht, N. (2018). Introduction: A local to global perspective on resource governance and conflict. Conflict, Security and Development, 18(6), 433–461. https://doi.org/10.1080/14678802.2018.1532641
Seligson, M. A. (2002). The impact of corruption on regime legitimacy: A comparative study of four Latin American countries. Journal of Politics, 64(2), 408–433. https://doi.org/10.1111/1468-2508.00132
Springer, A., Walkowiak, K., & Bernaciak, A. (2020). Leadership styles of rural leaders in the context of sustainable development requirements: A case study of commune mayors in the greater Poland Province, Poland. Sustainability (Switzerland), 12(7). https://doi.org/10.3390/su12072676
Taufiq, M., & Hidayat, R. (2022). The constraining dynamics to promote the inclusive village governance in an autocratic leadership setting. Journal of Governance and Local Politics, 4(1), 55–69. https://doi.org/10.47650/jglp.v4i1.442
Uberti, L. J. (2016). Can institutional reforms reduce corruption? Economic theory and patron-client politics in developing countries. Development and Change, 47(2), 317–345. https://doi.org/10.1111/dech.12222
Vaismoradi, M., Turunen, H., & Bondas, T. (2013). Content analysis and thematic analysis: Implications for conducting a qualitative descriptive study. Nursing and Health Sciences, 15(3), 398–405. https://doi.org/10.1111/nhs.12048
Vedeld, T. (2000). Village politics: Heterogeneity, leadership and collective action. Journal of Development Studies, 36(5), 105–134. https://doi.org/10.1080/00220380008422648
Venter, F. (2024). Consulting citizens: Addressing the deficits in participatory democracy. South African Journal on Human Rights. https://doi.org/10.1080/02587203.2024.2387855
von Luebke, C. (2009). The political economy of local governance: Findings from an Indonesian field study. Bulletin of Indonesian Economic Studies, 45(2), 201–230. https://doi.org/10.1080/00074910903040310
Zhang, X. (2006). Fiscal decentralization and political centralization in China: Implications for growth and inequality. WIDER Research Paper, 2006(93), 1–18. https://hdl.handle.net/10419/63529
Zilla, C. (2022). Defining democratic inclusion from the perspective of democracy and citizenship theory. Democratization, 29(8), 1518–1538. https://doi.org/10.1080/13510347.2022.2090929
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Salahuddin Salahuddin, Rifai Rifai, Rahmad Hidayat

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.