Non-conviction-based (NCB) asset forfeiture concept from a legal and human rights perspective
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.35335/ijopsor.v13i3.311Keywords:
Asset Forfeiture, Corruption, Human Rights, Non-Conviction-Based, Rule of LawAbstract
This study examines the concept of Non-Conviction-Based (NCB) asset forfeiture through a human rights perspective, focusing on the balance between effective law enforcement and the protection of individual rights. NCB forfeiture enables the state to confiscate assets linked to criminal activity without requiring a prior conviction, making it particularly relevant for addressing corruption, money laundering, and organized crime. However, this mechanism raises concerns regarding property rights, due process, and potential state overreach. The analysis applies three theoretical frameworks, rule of law, due process theory, and property rights theory, to evaluate the legitimacy of NCB practices. Indonesia’s legal and human rights framework, including the 1945 Constitution, Law No. 8/2010 on Money Laundering, Law No. 31/1999 jo. Law No. 20/2001 on Corruption, Law No. 39/1999 on Human Rights, and Law No. 12/2005 ratifying the ICCPR, demonstrates the requirement for fairness and judicial oversight in asset forfeiture procedures. Findings indicate that NCB forfeiture can be compatible with human rights standards if implemented with strict safeguards, transparent procedures, and clear evidentiary thresholds. The study concludes that a comprehensive Asset Forfeiture Law is necessary to reinforce accountability, protect individual rights, and strengthen Indonesia’s asset recovery regime.
References
Bechara, F. R., & Manzano, G. M. (2020). Anticorruption policies in Brazil: constitutional challenges on implementing asset civil forfeiture. Journal of Financial Crime, 27(4), 1013–1025. https://doi.org/10.1108/JFC-04-2020-0050
DAVIS, P. J. (2016). “To Return the Funds at All”: Global Anticorruption, Forfeiture, and Legal Frameworks for Asset Return. The University of Memphis Law Review, 47, 291.
DeAlto, K., & Zagaris, B. (2021). Transnational Corruption and Int’l Asset Forfeiture. IELR, 37, 24.
Dianta, D., Anggraini, A. M., & Ravizki, E. N. (2024). The Urgency of Asset Forfeiture Bill in Preventing Corruption Acts as an Effort to Address Structural Poverty in Indonesia. Proceeding IROFONIC 2023.
Didwania, S. H. (2025). Asset Forfeiture and Inequality. Stanford Law Review, 77(1), 159.
Farida Wulandari, Soerya Respationo, & Erniyanti Erniyanti. (2024). Juridical Analysis Of The Mechanism Of Non-Conviction Based Asset Forfeiture In The Settlement Of Corruption Crimes. International Journal of Social Science and Humanity, 1(3), 28–40. https://doi.org/10.62951/ijss.v1i3.48
Hufron, H., & Fikri, S. (2024). The urgency of regulating forfeiture of assets gained from corruption in Indonesia. Legality : Jurnal Ilmiah Hukum, 32(2), 292–310. https://doi.org/10.22219/ljih.v32i2.35243
Hutajulu, J. A., & Hufron, H. (2025). The Urgency of Enacting Legislation on Asset Forfeiture from Corruption Crimes. SEED: Journal of Scientific Research, 1(2), 63–68. https://doi.org/10.70716/seed.v1i2.128
Ireland, D. (2024). Deterring Corruption Through Asset Seizure: The Latest in Unexplained Wealth Orders. In Grand Corruption. In Grand Corruption (pp. 193–207). Routledge.
Kurniawan, I. D., Soehartono, Setyawan, V. P., & Santos, J. G. (2024). The Urgency of Implementing Non-Conviction Based Asset Forfeiture in Recovery of State Losses Due to Corruption. LAW & PASS: International Journal of Law, Public Administration and Social Studies, 1(2), 75–80. https://doi.org/10.47353/lawpass.v1i2.8
Lukito, A. S. (2019). Revealing the unexplained wealth in Indonesian corporation. Journal of Financial Crime, 27(1), 29–42. https://doi.org/10.1108/JFC-11-2018-0116
Mahmud, A. (2024). Dynamics of Problem of Asset Forfeiture of Corruption Proceeds and the Concept of Its Law Enforcement. Jurnal Wawasan Yuridika, 7(2), 173–196. https://doi.org/10.25072/jwy.v7i2.456
Marune, A. E. M. S. (2022). Relevance of Legal Research Methodology in Addressing Modern Legal Challenges. Pena Justisia: Media for Communication and Legal Studies, 21(2), 1–15.
Marune, A. E. M. S. (2023). Metamorfosis Metode Penelitian Hukum: Mengarungi Eksplorasi yang Dinamis. Civilia: Jurnal Kajian Hukum Dan Pendidikan Kewarganegaraan, 2(4), 73–81. https://doi.org/doi.org/10.572349/civilia.v2i4.896
McCaw, C. E. (2011). Asset Forfeiture as a Form of Punishment: A Case for Integrating Asset Forfeiture into Criminal Sentencing, 38 AM. J. CRIM. L, 181, 193.
PRIYATNO, D. (2018). Non Conviction Based (NCB) Asset Forfeiture for Recovering the Corruption Proceeds in Indonesia. Journal of Advanced Research in Law and Economics, 9(1), 219. https://doi.org/10.14505//jarle.v9.1(31).27
R, M. F. A., Karim, M. S., & Haeranah. (2022). The Concept of Non-Conviction Based Asset Forfeiture As a Legal Policy in Assets Criminal Action of Corruption. J Legal, Brief, Legal Brief, 11(5), 2613–2622.
Ristamana, Y., Ma’ruf, U., & Sugiharto, R. S. (2022). The Forfeiture of the Convict’s Assets Obtained from the Corruption Crime. Law Development Journal, 4(2), 298–306. https://doi.org/10.30659/ldj.4.2.%25p
Saleh, Nurjaya, I. N., Suryokumoro, H., Noerdjsakti, S., & Zerlina, Z. (2023). ASSET RECOVERY POLICY IN THE DRAFT OF THE ASSETFORFEITURE BILL IN CORRUPTION CASES. J. Int’l Legal Commc’n, 9(2), 46–55. https://doi.org/10.32612/uw.27201643
Santoso, H. A. (2025). THE URGENCY OF ASSET FORFEITURE LEGISLATION: OPTIMIZING THE PREVENTION OF CORRUPTION CRIMES. ANAYASA : Journal of Legal Studies, 3(1), 72–80. https://doi.org/10.61397/ays.v3i1.432
Sianipar, F. A., Sambas, N., & Yanto, O. (2024). THE INDONESIAN ARRANGEMENT OF ASSET FORFEITURE DRAFT AS REFORM EFFORTS IN RECOVERING STATE LOSSES DUE TO CORRUPTION: A COMPARATIVE STUDY OF UNITED STATES CODE. Journal of Court and Justice, 29–46. https://doi.org/10.56943/jcj.v3i2.509
Soesatyo, B. (2025). The Urgency of Asset Confiscation Results of Corruption and Criminal Acts Money Laundering: Solutions to Eradicate Corruption and Reform of National Laws. Jurnal Greenation Sosial Dan Politik, 3(4), 1069–1079. https://doi.org/10.38035/jgsp.v3i4.531
Sry Karina Br. Sinuhaji, & Mar’ie Mahfudz Harahap. (2024). Problems of the Formulation of Asset Forfeiture Resulting from Corruption Crimes: A Comparative and Conceptual Study. Istinbath : Jurnal Hukum, 21(01), 139–154. https://doi.org/10.32332/istinbath.v21i01.9695
Suhartono, A., & Panjaitan, H. (2025). Normative Reconstruction of Asset Forfeiture: A Legal Pathway Following Demise of Corruption Suspects. SIGn Jurnal Hukum, 7(2), 682–707. https://doi.org/10.37276/sjh.v7i2.511
Trinchera, T. (2020). Confiscation And Asset Recovery: Better Tools To Fight Bribery And Corruption Crime. Criminal Law Forum, 31(1), 49–79. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10609-020-09382-1
Yusni, M., Sigalingging, B., Asmadi, E., & Kodiyat, B. A. (2023). Policy On Confiscation Of Assets From Corruption Crime Based On Criminal Forfeiture And Civil Forfeiture. International Journal Reglement & Society (IJRS), 4(3), 307–320. https://doi.org/10.55357/ijrs.v4i3.645
Zagaris, B. (2024). Transnational Corruption and Asset Forfeiture. IELR, 40, 311.
Zagaris, B., & Bannister, M. (2020). Transnational Corruption and Int’l Asset Forfeiture. IELR, 36, 137.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Dionysius Yasmin Pongkor
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
