https://ijobsor.pelnus.ac.id/index.php/ijopsor <p>The International Journal of Politics and Sociology Research [<a href="https://issn.lipi.go.id/terbit/detail/1370404944" target="_blank" rel="noopener">2338-3879</a> (Print) is published with both online and print versions devoted to provide the publication of research finding in politics and sociology research. Objectives The main goal of International Journal of Politics and Sociology Research is to present outstanding, high quality research developments in all areas of politics and sociology research to a broad audience of academicians and professionals. Readership International Journal of Politics and Sociology Research provides a vehicle to help professionals, academics, and researchers working in the fields of politics and sociology to disseminate information and to learn from each other's work. Contents International Journal of Politics and Sociology Research publishes original papers, review papers, technical reports, book reviews, commentaries, and news. Special Issues devoted to important topics within politics and sociology research will be occasionally published.</p> Trigin Publisher en-US The International Journal of Politics and Sociology Research 2338-3879 https://ijobsor.pelnus.ac.id/index.php/ijopsor/article/view/331 <p>This research examines the mechanism for the annulment of arbitral awards in Indonesia under Law No. 30 of 1999. Although arbitral awards are inherently final and binding, positive law provides an avenue for annulment through the District Court based on the limited grounds specified in Article 70. The primary legal issue arises from the dualism in judicial views regarding the availability of Civil Review (PK) against such annulment decisions. Utilizing a normative legal research method, this study analyzes the <em>ratio legis</em> of annulment regulations and the implications of Supreme Court Circular (SEMA) No. 4 of 2016. The findings indicate that the Circular strictly prohibits Civil Review to ensure swifter legal certainty and business efficiency. However, the annulment mechanism still carries risks regarding the loss of confidentiality and potential time inefficiency for the parties. The author concludes that courts must adhere to the principle of minimal intervention, where annulment is granted only under extraordinary conditions without re-examining the merits of the case, to maintain the integrity of arbitration as a trusted dispute resolution institution for the international business community.</p> Hetty Maria Pasaribu Dhaniswara K Harjono Bernard Nainggolan Copyright (c) 2026 Hetty Maria Pasaribu, Dhaniswara K Harjono, Bernard Nainggolan https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0 2026-06-11 2026-06-11 14 1 9 14 10.35335/ijopsor.v14i1.331 https://ijobsor.pelnus.ac.id/index.php/ijopsor/article/view/332 <p>This study aims to analyze the implementation of legal protection for domestic workers (PRT) in Indonesia based on applicable laws and regulations reviewed from a human rights perspective, as well as to identify legal obstacles and efforts to strengthen the protection of domestic workers' rights. The research method used is normative legal research (juridical normative) with a statute approach and a conceptual approach. Research data were obtained through a literature study using primary, secondary, and tertiary legal materials analyzed qualitatively descriptively. The results of the study indicate that the implementation of legal protection for domestic workers in Indonesia is still not optimal because there is no specific law that comprehensively regulates the status and protection of domestic workers, thus creating a legal vacuum in the practice of domestic employment relations. In addition, weak supervision, minimal recognition of the status of domestic workers in the national employment system, and low legal awareness are the main obstacles in fulfilling the rights of domestic workers. From a human rights perspective, the state has an obligation to respect, protect, and fulfill the rights of domestic workers by strengthening regulations, increasing access to justice, and accelerating the ratification of special regulations to ensure fair and dignified legal protection.</p> William Rando Bayakta Copyright (c) 2026 William Rando Bayakta https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0 2026-06-11 2026-06-11 14 1 1 8 10.35335/ijopsor.v14i1.332