Optimizing public accessibility: A review of the urgency of e-government for Bima District
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.35335/ijopsor.v12i1.230Keywords:
Accessibility, E-Government, Public, UrgencyAbstract
This study highlights the urgency of enhancing public accessibility through the implementation of E-Government in Bima District. The research employed a descriptive method with a qualitative approach. The findings indicate that in the context of digital transformation, E-Government becomes a key to improving public access to government services in Bima District, Indonesia. Despite offering significant potential in enhancing efficiency, transparency, and affordability of public services, the implementation of E-Government faces several challenges. Uneven technology infrastructure, low digital literacy, and the lack of trained human resources are among the obstacles that need to be overcome. This study underscores the urgency of enhancing public accessibility through E-Government in Bima District. With a focus on social inclusion, democratic participation, economic aspects, and data security, efforts to address infrastructure constraints, digital literacy, and human resource availability become crucial. Through strategic measures such as technology infrastructure development, enhancement of digital literacy, and inter-agency government coordination, Bima District can achieve significant improvements in public accessibility, increase efficiency in public service, and strengthen community participation in the development process and decision-making
References
Ariana, S., Azim, C., & Antoni, D. (2020). Clustering of ICT human resources capacity in the implementation of E-government in expansion area: a case study from pali regency. Cogent Business and Management, 7(1). https://doi.org/10.1080/23311975.2020.1754103
Arman, A., Ishaka, M., & Haeril, H. (2022). Analisis Implementasi Sistem Informasi Manajemen Daerah (SIMDA) Terhadap Kualitas Laporan Keuangan SKPD (Studi Pada Kantor BPPKAD Kabupaten Bima). YUME: Journal of …, 5(3), 245–250. https://doi.org/10.37531/yume.vxix.547
Budai, B. B., & Tózsa, I. (2020). Regional inequalities in front-office services: Focus shift in e-government front offices and their regional projections in Hungary. Regional Statistics, 10(2), 206–227. https://doi.org/10.15196/RS100212
Darmawan, A. K., Siahaan, D. O., Susanto, T. D., Walid, M., Umam, B. A., & Hidayanto, A. N. (2020). Identifying the Differing Service Maturity Levels of Mobile-based Smart Regency with e-Government Adoption Model (GAM) framework. 7th International Conference on ICT for Smart Society: AIoT for Smart Society, ICISS 2020 - Proceeding, November. https://doi.org/10.1109/ICISS50791.2020.9307540
Farida, I., Setiawan, R., Maryatmi, A. S., & Juwita, N. (2020). The Implementation of E-Government in the Industrial Revolution Era 4.0 in Indonesia. International Journal of Progressive Sciences and Technologies (IJPSAT, 22(2), 340–346. http://ijpsat.ijsht-journals.org
Firman, F., Sahrul, S., & Ramadoan, S. (2023). Analysis of Efforts in the Development of Local Government: E-Government and Public Service Management. Jurnal Studi Ilmu Pemerintahan, 4(2), 25–36. http://www.jurnal-umbuton.jurnal.umbuton.ac.id/index.php/jsip/article/view/3465%0Ahttp://www.jurnal-umbuton.jurnal.umbuton.ac.id/index.php/jsip/article/download/3465/1973
Firmandayu, N., & Elfaki, K. E. (2023). The Electronic Government Policy-Based Green Constitution Towards Good Governance. Journal of Sustainable Development and Regulatory Issues (JSDERI), 1(2), 108–121. https://doi.org/10.53955/jsderi.v1i2.11
Gaufman, E. (2020). Cybercrime and Punishment: Security, Information War, and the Future of Runet. In The Palgrave Handbook of Digital Russia Studies. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-42855-6_7
Gupta, R., Muttoo, S. K., & Pal, S. K. (2020). Regional E-governance development index for developing nations. Digital Government: Research and Practice, 1(3). https://doi.org/10.1145/3386163
Hardi, R., & Gohwong, S. (2020). E-Government Based Urban Governance on the Smart City Program in Makassar, Indonesia. Journal of Contemporary Governance and Public Policy, 1(1), 12–17. https://doi.org/10.46507/jcgpp.v1i1.10
Sartika, R & Rifai. (2024). E-Government, manajemen, Layanan Publik, Kabupaten Bima. 4(6).
Ingrams, A., Manoharan, A., Schmidthuber, L., & Holzer, M. (2020). Stages and Determinants of E-Government Development: A Twelve-Year Longitudinal Study of Global Cities. International Public Management Journal, 23(6), 731–769. https://doi.org/10.1080/10967494.2018.1467987
Koniyo, M. H. (2021). Identification of components for evaluation e-government governance framework according to regional government characteristics. IOP Conference Series: Materials Science and Engineering, 1098(3), 032073. https://doi.org/10.1088/1757-899x/1098/3/032073
Kuswati, Y., Hartati, T., & Kusmayadi, D. (2022). Implementation of E-Government-Based Policies in Improving Public Service Satisfaction in the Majalengka Regency Local Government. International Journal of Social Science and Business, 6(3), 385–394. https://doi.org/10.23887/ijssb.v6i3.44831
Li, S., Wei, W., & Ma, M. (2021). How Does E-Government Affect Corruption? Provincial Panel Evidence from China. IEEE Access, 9, 94879–94888. https://doi.org/10.1109/ACCESS.2021.3093981
Lytras, M. D., & Şerban, A. C. (2020). E-Government Insights to Smart Cities Research: European Union (EU) Study and the Role of Regulations. IEEE Access, 8, 65313–65326. https://doi.org/10.1109/ACCESS.2020.2982737
Matitah, M., Arifin, S., Sumarto, S., & Widiyanto, W. (2021). Confronting E-Government Adoption in Indonesian Local Government. Journal of Indonesian Legal Studies, 6(2), 279–306. https://doi.org/10.15294/jils.v6i2.47795
Maulana, R. Y. (2020). Collaborative Governance in the Implementation of E-Government-Based Public Services Inclusion in Jambi Province, Indonesia. Journal of Governance, 5(1), 91–104. https://doi.org/10.31506/jog.v5i1.7317
Maulana, R. Y., & Bafadhal, F. (2020). Provision of Access to Information Services Based on E-Government in the Village Government. 439(Ticash 2019), 219–223. https://doi.org/10.2991/assehr.k.200515.037
Pakhalov, A. M., Rozhkova, N. A., & Alexopoulos, C. (2020). Assessing the quality of e-Government services for entrepreneurship: A comparative study in Russia’s regions. ACM International Conference Proceeding Series, 315–325. https://doi.org/10.1145/3428502.3428546
Palgrave. 2021_Book_ThePalgraveHandbookOfDigitalRu.pdf.crdownload. (n.d.).
Roblek, V., Bach, M. P., Meško, M., & Bertoncel, T. (2020). Best practices of the social innovations in the framework of the e-government evolution. Amfiteatru Economic, 22(53), 275–302. https://doi.org/10.24818/EA/2019/53/275
Rodriguez-Hevía, L. F., Navío-Marco, J., & Ruiz-Gómez, L. M. (2020). Citizens’ involvement in e-government in the European Union: The rising importance of the digital skills. Sustainability (Switzerland), 12(17). https://doi.org/10.3390/SU12176807
Suwarno, Y., & Wati, N. K. (2020). E-Government Institutional Capacity in Provincial Governments of West-Java and East-Java. Jurnal Studi Pemerintahan, 11(2). https://doi.org/10.18196/jgp.112117
Ullah, A., Pinglu, C., Ullah, S., Qaisar, Z. H., & Qian, N. (2022). The dynamic nexus of E-Government, and sustainable development: Moderating role of multi-dimensional regional integration index in Belt and Road partner countries. Technology in Society, 68(January), 101903. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techsoc.2022.101903
Utama, A. . G. S. (2020). The implementation of e-government in indonesia. International Journal of Research in Business and Social Science (2147- 4478), 9(7), 190–196. https://doi.org/10.20525/ijrbs.v9i7.929
Vázquez-López, A., & Marey-Perez, M. (2021). Factors affecting e-government adoption by dairy farmers: A case study in the north-west of Spain. Future Internet, 13(8). https://doi.org/10.3390/fi13080206
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2024 Syahri Ramadoan, Firman Firman, Sahrul Sahrul, Haeril Haeril
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
